IMPLEMENTASI PRINSIP ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB DIREKSI DALAM KERANGKA GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: STUDI KASUS PADA PT INTICORP LOGISTICS

Authors

  • Wiliarto Kuosastra Universitas Lancang Kuning, Indonesia Author
  • Miftahul Haq Universitas Lancang Kuning, Indonesia Author
  • Yelia Nathassa Winstar Universitas Lancang Kuning, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54314/jssr.v9i5.7332

Keywords:

environmental, social and governance, tanggung jawab direkso, fiduciary duty, good corporate governance, perusahaan logistik

Abstract

Abstract: This study analyses the legal position of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles within the framework of Good Corporate Governance (GCG), examines the implementation of ESG at PT Inticorp Logistics, and assesses the legal responsibility of the Board of Directors for ESG implementation under Indonesian company law. A normative juridical method was used with statutory, conceptual, and normative case study approaches. The analysis drew on Law Number 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies, Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 51/POJK.03/2017, the G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (2023), the IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards, and the doctrines of fiduciary duty, duty of care, duty of loyalty, and the business judgment rule, applied to the company's documents. The findings show that PT Inticorp Logistics has implemented ESG at the operational level through quality management, occupational health and safety systems, and a basic corporate governance structure. However, ESG has not been integrated into the directors' strategic policies, risk management, performance indicators, or sustainability reporting. Indonesian positive law does not explicitly require all companies to adopt ESG, so the absence of an ESG policy does not in itself constitute a breach of law. Nevertheless, ESG holds an implicit legal position as part of the directors' duty to manage the company in good faith and with due care. This study proposes a legal construction of ESG-based directors' responsibility that positions ESG integration as a concrete manifestation of fiduciary duty and duty of care.

 Keyword: Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG); directors' responsibility; fiduciary duty; good corporate governance; logistics company.

 

Abstrak: Penelitian ini menganalisis kedudukan hukum prinsip Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) dalam kerangka Good Corporate Governance (GCG), mengkaji implementasi ESG pada PT Inticorp Logistics, serta menilai tanggung jawab hukum Direksi dalam penerapan ESG berdasarkan hukum perseroan Indonesia. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan studi kasus normatif. Analisis didasarkan pada Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas, POJK Nomor 51/POJK.03/2017, G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (2023), IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards, serta doktrin fiduciary duty, duty of care, duty of loyalty, dan business judgment rule yang diterapkan pada dokumen perusahaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PT Inticorp Logistics telah menerapkan ESG pada tingkat operasional melalui sistem manajemen mutu, keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja, serta struktur dasar tata kelola perusahaan. Namun, ESG belum terintegrasi ke dalam kebijakan strategis Direksi, manajemen risiko, indikator kinerja, maupun pelaporan keberlanjutan. Hukum positif Indonesia belum secara eksplisit mewajibkan seluruh perseroan menerapkan ESG, sehingga ketiadaan kebijakan ESG tidak serta-merta merupakan pelanggaran hukum. Meskipun demikian, ESG memiliki kedudukan hukum secara implisit sebagai bagian dari kewajiban Direksi untuk mengurus perseroan dengan itikad baik dan penuh kehati-hatian. Penelitian ini menawarkan konstruksi hukum tanggung jawab Direksi berbasis ESG yang menempatkan integrasi ESG sebagai manifestasi konkret fiduciary duty dan duty of care.

Kata kunci: Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG); tanggung jawab Direksi; fiduciary duty; good corporate governance; perusahaan logistik.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bae, K. H., El Ghoul, S., Gong, Z. J., & Guedhami, O. (2021). Does CSR matter in times of crisis? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Corporate Finance, 67, 101876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101876

Chien, F. (2023). The role of corporate governance and environmental and social responsibilities on the achievement of sustainable development goals in Malaysian logistic companies. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(1), 1610–1630. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2090407

Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.021

Eriandani, R., & Winarno, W. A. (2024). ESG risk and firm value: The role of materiality in sustainability reporting. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 28(2), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v28i2.2019

Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001

Fuadah, L. L., Mukhtaruddin, M., Andriana, I., & Arisman, A. (2022). The ownership structure, and the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure, firm value and firm performance: The audit committee as moderating variable. Economies, 10(12), 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10120314

Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889

Global Sustainability Standards Board. (2021). Consolidated set of the GRI Standards. Global Reporting Initiative.

Govindan, K., Karaman, A. S., Uyar, A., & Kilic, M. (2023). Board structure and financial performance in the logistics sector: Do contingencies matter? Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 176, 103187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2023.103187

Ibrahim, J. (2006). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.

IFRS Foundation. (2023a). IFRS S1 General requirements for disclosure of sustainability-related financial information. International Sustainability Standards Board.

IFRS Foundation. (2023b). IFRS S2 Climate-related disclosures. International Sustainability Standards Board.

Lan, L. L., & Wan, W. (2023). ESG and director's duties: Defining and advancing the interests of the company. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 23(2), 537–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2024.2334966

Magaletti, N., Notarnicola, V., Di Molfetta, M., Mariani, S., & Leogrande, A. (2025). Logistics performance and the three pillars of ESG: A detailed causal and predictive investigation. Sustainability, 17(24), 11370. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172411370

Marek, R., & Staniuk, W. (2025). ESG reporting in the logistics chain. European Research Studies Journal, 28(3), 368–389. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/4048

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

OECD. (2023). G20/OECD principles of corporate governance 2023. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/ed750b30-en

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2021). Roadmap keuangan berkelanjutan tahap II (2021–2025). Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.

Panda, B., & Leepsa, N. M. (2017). Agency theory: Review of theory and evidence on problems and perspectives. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 10(1), 74–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686217701467

Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 51/POJK.03/2017 tentang Penerapan Keuangan Berkelanjutan bagi Lembaga Jasa Keuangan, Emiten, dan Perusahaan Publik.

Prabawati, P. I., & Rahmawati, I. P. (2022). The effects of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores on firm values in ASEAN member countries. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 26(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol26.iss2.art2

Prataviera, L. B., Creazza, A., Perotti, S., & Rodrigues, V. S. (2025). How to align logistics environmental sustainability with corporate strategy? An Italian perspective. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 28(9), 931–953. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2023.2230916

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2006). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Truant, E., Borlatto, E., Crocco, E., & Sahore, N. (2024). Environmental, social and governance issues in supply chains: A systematic review for strategic performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 140024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140024

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas.

World Economic Forum. (2021). The global risks report 2021 (16th ed.). World Economic Forum.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-21

How to Cite

IMPLEMENTASI PRINSIP ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB DIREKSI DALAM KERANGKA GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: STUDI KASUS PADA PT INTICORP LOGISTICS. (2026). JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH, 9(5), 8507 – 8514. https://doi.org/10.54314/jssr.v9i5.7332